|
| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Online | User List | Help |
|
|
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 4
|
|
| Author |
|
|
Advanced Member USA Joined: Nov 27, 2003 Post Count: 6285 Status: Offline |
LONDON (Reuters) - Animated footage promoting the logo for the 2012 London Olympic Games was removed from the organizers' Web site on Tuesday amid concern it could trigger epileptic fits. The video clip shows a diver plunging into a pool as part of a campaign to promote the jagged Olympic logo, a graffiti-like blow-up of the number 2012 in a range of colors including hot pink and electric blue. A London 2012 spokeswoman said the concerns surrounded a four-second piece of animation shown at the logo's launch on Monday and recorded by broadcasters. Emphasizing that it was not the logo itself which was the focus of health worries, she said: "This concerns a short piece of animation which we used as part of the logo launch event and not the actual logo." "It was a diver diving into a pool which had multi-color ripple effects," the spokeswoman said. Critics of the emblem have described it as "hideous," while organizers called it powerful and modern. The clip's removal follows comments by Professor Graham Harding, an expert in clinical neuro-physiology who developed a test used to measure photo-sensitivity levels in animated TV material. "The logo should not be shown on TV at all at the moment," Harding told the BBC. "It fails Harding FPA machine test which is the machine the television industry uses to test images." He said the footage did not comply with regulatory guidelines. Charity Epilepsy Action noted there had been reports that people had had seizures while watching the animated footage. The BBC reported on its Web site that a listener had rung its London radio station to say he and his girlfriend had suffered seizures while watching it. ---------------------------------- For my critics who have not believed me about fast colorful animation... I may be a bit off but it doesn't mean I am wrong I must add as well - It is Bloody ugly. ---------------------------------------- [Edit 2 times, last edit by LSW at Jun 6, 2007 7:02:49 PM] |
||
|
|
Advanced Member Joined: May 26, 2006 Post Count: 1757 Status: Offline |
Kyle, I saw this one Yahoo! and briefly skimmed it but this post sums it up. Internet Specialist 1 huh?? Is that your new title at your new job? It's a shame how they butcher web design job titles. |
||
|
|
Advanced Member USA Joined: Nov 27, 2003 Post Count: 6285 Status: Offline |
Yea, Internet Specialist I, but only till I am not new at some time it will be Internet Specialist II, then III and one day Governor But seen their are many web designers, but I am a specialist Then again my certificate from my original training says I am a "Internet Producer", Oooooooooooooooooooohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh! |
||
|
|
Advanced Member Joined: May 26, 2006 Post Count: 1757 Status: Offline |
then III and one day Governor Wow! that's a big jump! But a specialist is always better than "that web guy". Let me know when you reach governor status or at least level III, then I can call in a favor. ![]() |
||
|
|
|
|
|
Current timezone is GMT May 24, 2013 6:30:11 PM |